NVIDIA GeForce G105M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G105M and NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1314 vs 512
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1314 vs 512
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1314 vs 512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1314 vs 512 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 68 vs 63
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 47 vs 23
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 68 vs 63 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 vs 23 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G105M | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 63 | 68 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 23 | 47 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2534 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1314 | 512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1314 | 512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G105M | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | |
Code name | G98 | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1665 | 1668 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1600 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 38 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 5.12 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3) | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |