NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 129 vs 89
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 34
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 June 2008 vs 1 May 2007
Core clock speed 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 20 Watt
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 129 vs 89
PassMark - G2D Mark 46 vs 34

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS

  • 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
  • Around 29% better floating-point performance: 28.8 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1095 vs 882
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1095 vs 882
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 16 vs 8
Floating-point performance 28.8 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 512 MB vs 256 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1095 vs 882
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1095 vs 882

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
129
89
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
46
34
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
882
1095
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
882
1095
Name NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark 129 89
PassMark - G2D Mark 46 34
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 882 1095
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 882 1095

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G98 G86
Launch date 3 June 2008 1 May 2007
Place in performance rating 1648 1651
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 450 MHz
CUDA cores 8
Floating-point performance 22.4 gflops 28.8 gflops
Gigaflops 31
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 8 16
Texture fill rate 4.4 GTexel / s 3.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 210 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-II
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 11.2 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR2, GDDR3 GDDR3, GDDR2
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0