NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 4200M and NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 48 vs 8
- 6.9x better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 295 vs 129
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 78 vs 46
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1726 vs 882
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1726 vs 882
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 295 vs 129 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 vs 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 vs 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 vs 882 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 25 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 4200M | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 295 | 129 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 46 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 103.797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 | 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 | 882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 4200M | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G98 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1639 | 1642 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 13 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 210 million |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Gigaflops | 31 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |