NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 129 vs 113
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 28
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 31 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 129 vs 113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 28 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 60.8 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1267 vs 882
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1267 vs 882
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 60.8 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1267 vs 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1267 vs 882 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 129 | 113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 28 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 882 | 1267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 882 | 1267 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G84 |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 31 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1643 | 1646 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 475 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 60.8 gflops |
Gigaflops | 31 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |