NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 513 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 11x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 143 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 50 vs 31
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 12 February 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 143 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 vs 31 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 12.31 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 96 vs 8
- 10.2x better floating-point performance: 228.1 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 320 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1584 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 413 vs 122
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12.31 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 228.1 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 320 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1584 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 413 vs 122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | 413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 31 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G80 |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 12 February 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1633 | 1635 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 513 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 228.1 gflops |
Gigaflops | 31 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 12.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 143 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 320 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 63.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1584 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |