NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 4.71 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 44.86 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 56 vs 50
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1017 vs 882
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1017 vs 882
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 September 2010 vs 3 June 2008
Core clock speed 589 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 4.71 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 16 vs 8
Floating-point performance 44.86 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 512 MB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 56 vs 50
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1017 vs 882
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1017 vs 882

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

  • Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 25 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 122 vs 120
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 122 vs 120

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
56
50
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
120
122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1017
882
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1017
882
Name NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
PassMark - G2D Mark 56 50
PassMark - G3D Mark 120 122
Geekbench - OpenCL 2795
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1017 882
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1017 882

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla
Code name GT218 G98
Launch date 3 September 2010 3 June 2008
Place in performance rating 1630 1633
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 589 MHz 550 MHz
Floating-point performance 44.86 gflops 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 16 8
Texture fill rate 4.71 GTexel / s 4.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 13 Watt
Transistor count 260 million 210 million
CUDA cores 8
Gigaflops 31

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 12.64 GB / s 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1580 MHz 1400 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA