NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • 7.8x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 256 vs 128
  • 5.2x better floating-point performance: 602.1 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1080 vs 261
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 vs 75
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 March 2016 vs 18 September 2013
Core clock speed 965 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 128
Floating-point performance 602.1 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1080 vs 261
PassMark - G2D Mark 151 vs 75

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 16 Watt
  • Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5751 vs 3912
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3691
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 16 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5751 vs 3912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1080
261
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
151
75
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3912
5751
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3691
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3691
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
Name NVIDIA GeForce 920MX AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 1080 261
PassMark - G2D Mark 151 75
Geekbench - OpenCL 3912 5751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3691 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3691 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 385

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell GCN 2.0
Code name GM108 Kalindi
Launch date 25 March 2016 18 September 2013
Place in performance rating 1035 1021
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 602.1 gflops 115.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 128
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s 3.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 16 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,178 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 IGP
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 System Shared
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers