NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs ATI FireGL T2-128
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and ATI FireGL T2-128 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 398 MHz
- 17.6x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 594 MHz
- 34.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1068 vs 31
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 1 October 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 398 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 594 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 vs 31 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL T2-128
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 178 vs 150
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 vs 150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: ATI FireGL T2-128
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | ATI FireGL T2-128 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 | 31 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 178 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | ATI FireGL T2-128 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Rage 8 |
| Code name | GM108 | RV350 |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 1 October 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1001 | 999 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 398 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 76 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 10.24 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 594 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
