NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1667
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3326
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1667
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3326 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1548 vs 1068
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 150
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 vs 3954
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 1764
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 1764
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1548 vs 1068 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 vs 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 vs 3954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 1764 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 | 1548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 350 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 | 9620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 2862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 2862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3326 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Tropo |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1001 | 1002 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |