NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
4x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 64 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3478
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3478
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 March 2016 vs 27 November 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	16 Watt vs 64 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3691 vs 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3691 vs 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 965 MHz
Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 28.22 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
Around 35% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 1080
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 151
Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4472 vs 3912
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1764
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1764
Around 42% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 385

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 965 MHz
Texture fill rate	33.9 billion / sec vs 28.22 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 256
Floating-point performance	812.5 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1750 vs 1080
PassMark - G2D Mark	359 vs 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	4472 vs 3912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663 vs 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663 vs 1764
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	545 vs 385

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

1750

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

151

359

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3912

4472

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1764

2663

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3691

3478

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3332

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1764

2663

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3691

3478

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3332

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

385

545

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark	1080	1750
PassMark - G2D Mark	151	359
Geekbench - OpenCL	3912	4472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1764	2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3691	3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1764	2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3691	3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	385	545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		23.499

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM108	GK106
Launch date	25 March 2016	27 November 2013
Place in performance rating	1035	1037
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$144.81
Value for money (0-100)		16.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	1058 MHz
Floating-point performance	602.1 gflops	812.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	384
Texture fill rate	28.22 GTexel / s	33.9 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	16 Watt	64 Watt
CUDA cores		384
Transistor count		2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 6-pin
Height		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.70" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
Adaptive VSync
FXAA
TXAA