NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G and ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 337 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 600 MHz vs 486 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 85 vs 25
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 137
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2008 vs 13 February 2004 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 337 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 600 MHz vs 486 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 85 vs 25 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 137 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 85 | 25 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 8 |
Code name | G86 | M10 |
Launch date | 1 February 2008 | 13 February 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1175 | 1176 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 337 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 1.348 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 76 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 7.78 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 486 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |