ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 45x more pipelines: 720 vs 16
- 39.4x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 7.7x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 13.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 85
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 242
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 778
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 778
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 1 February 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 vs 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 778 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 6.6x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 86 Watt
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 | 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 242 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 778 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Juniper | G86 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 1 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1210 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 210 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870 X2
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
