NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
• 9.4x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• 3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 497 vs 85
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 778
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 778

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 142

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 85
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	142 242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3257 778
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3257 778

Compare specifications (specs)