NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 100 vs 37
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 June 2008 vs 11 October 2004 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 100 vs 37 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6200
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 31 vs 26
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 31 vs 26 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 100 | 37 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 26 | 31 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G98 | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 4 June 2008 | 11 October 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1679 | 1677 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 34 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 1.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 146 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-I | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 191 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 8.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |