NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS vs ATI Radeon HD 3450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS and ATI Radeon HD 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 28 vs 25
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 747 vs 735
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 747 vs 735
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 June 2008 vs 10 December 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 28 vs 25 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 vs 735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 vs 735 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3450
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 40 vs 8
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 48 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 157 vs 94
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Pipelines | 40 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 48 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 157 vs 94 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | ATI Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 94 | 157 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 28 | 25 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 | 735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 | 735 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | ATI Radeon HD 3450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | G98 | RV620 |
| Launch date | 4 June 2008 | 10 December 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1679 | 1680 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 48 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 34 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-I | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS with others
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M GS vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6200
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M GS vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M GS vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7600 GS
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M GS vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7300 LE
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M GS vs
ATIRadeon HD 3450
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M GS vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
