NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 100 vs 79
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 747 vs 169
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 747 vs 169
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 June 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 100 vs 79 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 vs 169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 vs 169 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 25.6 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 13 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 26
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 13 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 26 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 100 | 79 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 26 | 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 | 169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 | 169 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G86 |
Launch date | 4 June 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1679 | 1681 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Gigaflops | 34 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-I | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
nView |