NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930M and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M

• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3065
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3065

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 928 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 941 MHz
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1125 vs 1014
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 150
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5926 vs 5144
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 vs 22.344
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 168.449 vs 166.907
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 vs 1.225
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 vs 19.899
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 84.246
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1987
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1987

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1014 1125
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	150 155
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5144 5926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.344 25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.907 168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.225 1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.899 21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.246 101.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1987 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1987 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357

Compare specifications (specs)