NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930M and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 738
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5258 vs 4035
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1668
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 vs 738 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5258 vs 4035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 941 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 150
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5258 | 4035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1668 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 930M | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GM108 | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1202 | 1205 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 22.58 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Quick Sync |