NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and Intel HD Graphics 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1289 vs 874
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5525 vs 3548
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 vs 1225
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 1363
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3259
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 vs 1225
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 1363
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1289 vs 874 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5525 vs 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3259 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 17 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 194
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 17 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 vs 194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1289 | 874 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5525 | 3548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1124 | 1125 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 930MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 350
