NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.7x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 5532
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 23.565
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 165.338
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 1.09
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 783.4 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 5532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 23.565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 165.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 1.09 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1284 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 13075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | 33.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | 1127.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | 3.833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1114 | 1117 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 177.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 930MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 350
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon 520
