NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 22.3x more texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 99.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1288 vs 13
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 159
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 1 March 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 275 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 vs 13 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 159 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5300
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 | 13 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 159 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Rankine |
| Code name | GM108 | NV34 A1 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 1 March 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1100 | 1098 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 275 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 45 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||

