NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs AMD Radeon HD 7450A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and AMD Radeon HD 7450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 783.4 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1288 vs 288
- 8.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5533 vs 668
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 902
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1592
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 902
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1592
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 vs 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1592 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450A
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 195
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 195 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | AMD Radeon HD 7450A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 | 288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 | 668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1592 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | AMD Radeon HD 7450A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1100 | 1102 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |