NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- 2x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 84.8 gflops vs 44.8 gflops
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops vs 44.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G96 |
Launch date | 27 August 2008 | 19 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1579 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.8 gflops | 84.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |