NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 64 vs 16
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 44.8 gflops
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 44.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 87 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G94 |
Launch date | 27 August 2008 | 21 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1339 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.8 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 240 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |