NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs ATI Radeon IGP 345M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT and ATI Radeon IGP 345M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 7.7x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 183 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 180 nm
- 54x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 162 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 August 2008 vs 5 October 2002 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 183 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 180 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 162 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon IGP 345M
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 82 vs 39
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 82 vs 39 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 345M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | ATI Radeon IGP 345M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 162 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 39 | 82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1016 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1016 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | ATI Radeon IGP 345M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 6 |
Code name | G86 | RS200 |
Launch date | 1 August 2008 | 5 October 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1467 | 1470 |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 183 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |