NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 vs 26.532
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3329
• 5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 954 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 993 MHz
• Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 82% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1516
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 172
• Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 6325
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 28.91
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 312.94
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.83
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 103.937
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2486
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3587
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2486
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3587

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1516 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	172 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6325 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.91 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.94 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.83 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.833 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	103.937 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2486 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3587 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	585 117

Compare specifications (specs)