NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 1002.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 versus 26.532
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3329
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3329
- 5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 versus 117
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 versus 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 82% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 82% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1516
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 172
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 6325
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 28.91
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 312.94
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.83
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 103.937
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 2486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3587
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 2486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3587
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3587 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GM108 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 707 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |