NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G and ATI Radeon 9800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 380 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 4 GTexel / s vs 3.04 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 122 vs 66
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 1 October 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 380 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s vs 3.04 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 680 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 vs 66 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 172
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | 66 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 175 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Rage 9 |
| Code name | G96 | R360 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 1 October 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1009 | 1011 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 380 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 40 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 60 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | 3.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 21.76 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||