ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 3 June 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 380 MHz
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 122 vs 66
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 vs 66 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 | 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RS880 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 982 | 983 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 380 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 181 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 40 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 60 | |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |