NVIDIA NVS 5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5100M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 62 vs 50
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2747 vs 2414
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 2414
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 1 November 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 vs 50 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2747 vs 2414 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2747 vs 2414 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 64 vs 48
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 169.6 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 534 vs 200
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 vs 200 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA NVS 5100M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 200 | 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 | 50 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6549 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2747 | 2414 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2747 | 2414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA NVS 5100M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT216 | G94 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 1 November 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1483 | 1484 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 530 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops | 169.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 16 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 486 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Gigaflops | 254 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
