NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 64 vs 32
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 357 vs 209
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3076 vs 1901
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3076 vs 1901
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 357 vs 209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 vs 1901 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 vs 1901 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 72
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 72 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 357 | 209 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 72 | 120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 | 1901 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 | 1901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G94 | G96 |
| Launch date | 21 August 2008 | 29 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1373 | 1374 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 625 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 64 | 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 99.2 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 240 | 148 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 64 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||

