NVIDIA GeForce 9800S vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800S and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 669 MHz
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 July 2008 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- 11x more texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.2 billion / sec
- 10x more pipelines: 2x 320 vs 64
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 428.2 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1656 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 822 vs 636
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 320 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 428.2 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 822 vs 636 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 422 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G94 | RV670 |
Launch date | 15 July 2008 | 4 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 351 | 349 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 669 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 billion / sec | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
Display Connectors | VGAHDMISingle Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |