NVIDIA GeForce 9800S vs ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800S and ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 19.2 billion / sec vs 8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 July 2008 vs 13 January 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 billion / sec vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 427
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 954 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 427 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder X1900
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 127 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
| Code name | G94 | R580 |
| Launch date | 15 July 2008 | 13 January 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 380 | 383 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 billion / sec | 8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 384 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
| Display Connectors | VGAHDMISingle Link DVI | 1x DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 30.53 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
