NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT vs ATI Radeon 9200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT and ATI Radeon 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 1.6 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 700 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 40 vs 4
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 1.6 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 40 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 134
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 vs 134 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT | ATI Radeon 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 40 | 4 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 134 | 135 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT | ATI Radeon 9200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Rankine | Rage 7 |
| Code name | NV35 | RV280 |
| Launch date | 12 May 2003 | 1 May 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1229 | 1230 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.6 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 135 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0a | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
