NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 45 vs 40
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 vs 12 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 vs 40 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 134 vs 132
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 134 vs 132 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 | 40 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 | 134 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rankine |
Code name | G72 | NV35 |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 | 12 May 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1190 | 1192 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 112 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 350 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | 64 | DDR |
Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |