NVIDIA GeForce G 205M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G 205M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 518 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
| Core clock speed | 518 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce G 205M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | MCP79MX | GT200B |
| Launch date | 1 January 2010 | 8 December 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 518 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2016 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce G 205M with others
NVIDIAGeForce G 205M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
NVIDIAGeForce G 205M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4520
NVIDIAGeForce G 205M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260 OEM
