NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 4.32 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 63 vs 56
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 176 vs 67
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 vs 56 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 176 vs 67 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 28.8 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 892 vs 593
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 892 vs 593
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 28.8 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 892 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 892 vs 593 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 | 56 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 176 | 67 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 593 | 892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 593 | 892 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G86 |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1623 | 1624 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | 28.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 / GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |