NVIDIA GeForce G110M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G110M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce G110M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G110M

20.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 289 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	14 Watt vs 289 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1000 MHz
28.8x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
30x more pipelines: 2x 240 vs 16
37.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 596.2 gflops vs 32 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
2x more memory clock speed: 999 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz

Core clock speed	1242 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	92.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 240 vs 16
Floating-point performance	2x 596.2 gflops vs 32 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm vs 65 nm
Memory clock speed	999 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Name	NVIDIA GeForce G110M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
PassMark - G3D Mark		1201
PassMark - G2D Mark		96
Geekbench - OpenCL		21048
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3107
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3107

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce G110M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Essentials
Architecture	Tesla	Tesla 2.0
Code name	G96	GT200B
Launch date	8 January 2009	8 January 2009
Place in performance rating	not rated	920
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$500
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		8.53
Technical info
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1242 MHz
CUDA cores	16	480
Floating-point performance	32 gflops	2x 596.2 gflops
Gigaflops	48
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	16	2x 240
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s	92.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	14 Watt	289 Watt
Transistor count	314 million	1,400 million
CUDA cores per GPU		240
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	DisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI options		Quad
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin & 8-pin
API support
DirectX	10.0	10.0
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Memory
Memory bandwidth	8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3)	223.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	896 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz	999 MHz
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1792 MB
Memory interface width per GPU		448 Bit
Standard memory config per GPU		896 MB
Technologies
CUDA
Power management	8.0
3D Vision
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)		128bit
SLI