NVIDIA GeForce G110M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G110M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G110M
- 20.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 289 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 289 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 28.8x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 30x more pipelines: 2x 240 vs 16
- 37.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 596.2 gflops vs 32 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 999 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 240 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops vs 32 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G110M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G110M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G96 | GT200B |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 927 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1242 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 480 |
Floating-point performance | 32 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 48 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 2x 240 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 289 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3) | 223.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
3D Vision | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |