NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce G105M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce G105M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce G105M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
Around 69% better floating-point performance: 43.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
2x more memory clock speed: 1008 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 40 vs 23
Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 119 vs 63

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	26 May 2009 vs 8 January 2009
Pipelines	16 vs 8
Floating-point performance	43.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm vs 65 nm
Memory clock speed	1008 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	40 vs 23
PassMark - G3D Mark	119 vs 63

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M

2.9x more core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 550 MHz
Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 5.12 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 31 Watt
Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2534 vs 2451
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1314 vs 866
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1314 vs 866

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1600 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	5.12 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	14 Watt vs 31 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2534 vs 2451
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1314 vs 866
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1314 vs 866

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G105M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

119

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2451

2534

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

866

1314

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

866

1314

Name	NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce G105M
PassMark - G2D Mark	40	23
PassMark - G3D Mark	119	63
Geekbench - OpenCL	2451	2534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	866	1314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	866	1314

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce G105M
Essentials
Architecture	Tesla	Tesla
Code name	G96C	G98
Launch date	26 May 2009	8 January 2009
Place in performance rating	1664	1666
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1600 MHz
Floating-point performance	43.2 gflops	25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	16	8
Texture fill rate	4.4 GTexel / s	5.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	31 Watt	14 Watt
Transistor count	314 million	210 million
CUDA cores		8
Gigaflops		38
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA	VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
API support
DirectX	10.0	10.0
OpenGL	3.3	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	8.06 GB / s	8 (DDR2) / 11 (GDDR3)
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1008 MHz	500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory type	DDR2	GDDR3
Technologies
CUDA
Power management		8.0