NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 48.96 gflops vs 43.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 119 vs 113
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2949 vs 2451
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 866
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 866
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 26 May 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops vs 43.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 119 vs 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 vs 2451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 vs 866 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 vs 866 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 35 vs 22
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 vs 22 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 119 | 113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | 2451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | 866 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 | 866 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G96C |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 26 May 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1671 | 1672 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | 43.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 8.06 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |