NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 43.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 124 vs 111
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 866 vs 494
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 866 vs 494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 43.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 124 vs 111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 866 vs 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 866 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 43 vs 38
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 31 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 vs 38 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 43 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 124 | 111 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2451 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 866 | 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 866 | 494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G96C | G98 |
| Launch date | 26 May 2009 | 7 May 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1675 | 1676 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54.50 | |
| Price now | $49.75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 43.2 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.06 GB / s | 11.12 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz | 1390 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |

