NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 43.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 119 vs 93
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 866 vs 494
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 866 vs 494
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 43.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 119 vs 93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 866 vs 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 866 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 40
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 40 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 40 | 46 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 119 | 93 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2451 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 866 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 866 | 494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G98 |
Launch date | 26 May 2009 | 7 May 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1664 | 1665 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $54.50 | |
Price now | $49.75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 43.2 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.06 GB / s | 11.12 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz | 1390 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |