NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1134 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 240 vs 32
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 673.9 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 512 MB
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1385 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G96C | GT200B |
Launch date | 20 January 2009 | 15 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1233 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 89.6 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 896 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 448 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1134 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |