NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 28 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
- 2x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 3x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 151
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 50 vs 32
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 vs 151 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 vs 32 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 151 | 554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 50 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2273 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2273 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G96 | GT215 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1548 | 1535 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |