NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M and NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 151 vs 124
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2273 vs 1701
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2273 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 1 June 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 29 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 151 vs 124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2273 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2273 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 57 vs 32
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 vs 32 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M | NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 151 | 124 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2273 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2273 | 1701 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M | NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G96 | G84 |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 1 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1562 | 1564 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
