NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• Around 45% better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 80 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 224 vs 151
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 55 vs 32

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M

• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2273 vs 1814
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2273 vs 1814

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	224 151
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	55 32
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 2273
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 2273

Compare specifications (specs)