NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2.8x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 530 MHz
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2744 vs 2376
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2744 vs 2376

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• Around 33% better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 96 gflops
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1598 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 145
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 29

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	145 367
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	29 38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2744 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2744 2376

Compare specifications (specs)