NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 134.4 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 424 vs 146
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 424 vs 146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 9.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2744 vs 1626
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2744 vs 1626
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2744 vs 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2744 vs 1626 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 424 | 146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 30 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1163 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.55 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 | 2744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 | 2744 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G96 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1518 | 1519 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 2.8 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Gigaflops | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1048 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 16 (DDR2) / 25 (GDDR3) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 |