NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 144 gflops vs 121.44 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 220 vs 218
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 44 vs 42
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 5251
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops vs 121.44 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 vs 218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 vs 42 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 vs 5251 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 58 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 1686
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 1686
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 58 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 vs 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 vs 1686 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 | 218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 42 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 | 5251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 | 1903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 | 1903 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G94 | GT216 |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 | 10 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1584 |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 48 | 48 |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | 121.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 486 million |
Gigaflops | 182 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
SLI |