Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 44
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 vs 26 January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 44 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- 36.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 220 vs 6
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 vs 6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | 220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 | 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 | Tesla |
Code name | GMA 600 | G94 |
Launch date | 1 May 2010 | 26 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1581 | 1583 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1360 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | 48 |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |