NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- 2x better floating-point performance: 144 gflops vs 72 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 219 vs 162
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 44 vs 42
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 219 vs 162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 vs 42 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 58 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 790 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 58 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 790 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 vs 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 vs 1686 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 219 | 162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 42 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 | 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 | 1687 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G96C |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 | 9 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1587 | 1588 |
Price now | $79.99 | $59.46 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | 5.88 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |